Comments on: Airlines Don’t Tell the Whole Story When it Come to Animal Deaths

By: JANET MITCHELL

JANET MITCHELL — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:32:51 +0000

IF I WAS A BUSINESS & TRANSPORTED AN ANIMAL VIA AIRLINE I WOULD TRAVEL WITH IT & REMAIN WITH IT TILL IT WAS SAFELY ABOARD THE PLANE. AND WHEN WE LANDED I WOULD BE RIGHT THERE WAITING FOR IT WHEN IT WAS BEING UNLOADED. I DON’T BELIEVE IN BREEDING DOGS FOR THEY MONEY. MOST BREEDERS BREED TO PROTECT THE BREED STANDERS, A TRUE BREEDER WOULD HAVE AT LEAST 25 YEARS OF EXPERANCE, THEY WOULD ALSO HAVE ALL KINDS OF REFERANCE’S,HEALTH CHECKS ON ALL DOG’S,& A COMPLETE FAMILY HISTORY GOING BACK AT LEAST 2 YEARS (SOMETIMES MORE UPON REQUEST). ALSO THEY WOULDN’T BREED A FEMALE DOG MORE THAN TWICE A YEAR. SO WHILE THERE ARE A FEW BAD BREEDERS & PUPPY MILLS OUT THERE. PLEASE DON’T CONFUSE THEM WITH THE GOOD ONES.

By: Admin

Admin — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:16:42 +0000

@AIR - Gotta say this one really disturbed me when I read it too. @Kerry - NO, you're not cracking up, not any more than usual anyway. If there's a legal loophole, you can bet it will be exploited and they're 'only animals' after all so why do they care? Ticks me off but good!! @JANET MITCHELL - Oh, I'm sure they tell the 'owners.' But to most of these owners, being businesses, it's "product" and all they care about usually is the monetary value anyway which the airline probably reimburses them for. To them it's probably not too much of a loss. They're still getting paid and that's what they usually care about anyway.

By: JANET MITCHELL

JANET MITCHELL — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 16:01:38 +0000

THIS IS BULL…. NOT REPORTING AN ANIMALS DEATH IN A CASE LIKE THIS TO ME IS A CRIME & TO DO SO SHOULD RESULT IN CRIMINAL CHARGES TO EVERYONE INVOLVED. THESE ASS….. NEED TO SIT BACK & THINK FOR A SECOND HOW WOULD THEY LIKE IT IF SOMEONE DID THIS TO THEIR ANIMAL & NOT TOLD THEM. WAKE UP PEOPLE THIS NEEDS TO BE CHANGED.

By: Kerry

Kerry — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:29:14 +0000

I am sick of these stupid legal loopholes!!An animal is defined “as a pet” only..That to me..is just ridiculous…The arrogance of it!!It seems to silently say the only life that is really important, is the human that would be affected by the death of an animal..Nevermind the actual life of an animal…Especially ones that are considered “merchandise”…I may be cracking up…This makes absolutely no sense to me..

By: AIR

AIR — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:04:45 +0000

Airlines have been very unpopular in their practices lately and this one really shocked me when I found it. I gotta fly to SC this weekend and I will be in SUCH a bad mood because of this.