Dog Training - Jan 2009

I’m not sure how much of a surprise this comes as, but a recent study by the University of Pennsylvania showed that people who use “confrontational or aversive methods” to train aggressive dogs found that unless modified training methods are used, dog will remain aggressive. When you really think about it, it’s not not much different than parents and children. You have parent that have bad habits, poor parenting skills, bad attitudes, you’re usually going to wound up with a child with the same characteristics. Just a case of “you reap what you sow.”

The study, published in the current issue of Applied Animal Behavior Science, also showed that using non-aversive or neutral training methods such as additional exercise or rewards elicited very few aggressive responses.

“Nationwide, the No. 1 reason why dog owners take their pet to a veterinary behaviorist is to manage aggressive behavior,” Meghan E. Herron, lead author of the study, said. “Our study demonstrated that many confrontational training methods, whether staring down dogs, striking them or intimidating them with physical manipulation does little to correct improper behavior and can elicit aggressive responses.”

The team from the School of Veterinary Medicine at Penn suggest that primary-care veterinarians advise owners of the risks associated with such training methods and provide guidance and resources for safe management of behavior problems. Herron, Frances S. Shofer and Ilana R. Reisner, veterinarians with the Department of Clinical Studies at Penn Vet, produced a 30-item survey for dog owners who made behavioral service appointments at Penn Vet. In the questionnaire, dog owners were asked how they had previously treated aggressive behavior, whether there was a positive, negative or neutral effect on the dogs’ behavior and whether aggressive responses resulted from the method they used. Owners were also asked where they learned of the training technique they employed.

Of the 140 surveys completed, the most frequently listed recommendation sources were “self” and “trainers.” Several confrontational methods such as “hit or kick dog for undesirable behavior” (43 percent), “growl at dog” (41 percent), “physically force the release of an item from a dog’s mouth” (39 percent), “alpha roll” physically — rolling the dog onto its back and holding it (31 percent), “stare at or stare down” (30 percent), “dominance down” —- physically forcing the dog down onto its side (29 percent) and “grab dog by jowls and shake” (26 percent) elicited an aggressive response from at least 25 percent of the dogs on which they were attempted. In addition, dogs brought to the hospital for aggressive behavior towards familiar people were more likely to respond aggressively to some confrontational techniques than dogs brought in for other behavioral reasons.

“This study highlights the risk of dominance-based training, which has been made popular by TV, books and punishment-based training advocates,” Herron said. “These techniques are fear-eliciting and may lead to owner-directed aggression.”

Prior to seeking the counsel of a veterinary behaviorist, many dog owners attempt behavior-modification techniques suggested by a variety of sources. Recommendations often include the aversive-training techniques listed in the survey, all of which may provoke fearful or defensively aggressive behavior. Their common use may have grown from the idea that canine aggression is rooted in the need for social dominance or to a lack of dominance displayed by the owner. Advocates of this theory therefore suggest owners establish an “alpha” or pack-leader role. (Science Daily)

Think about it, makes sense doesn’t it? I believe a person needs to maintain control over their dog very much in the same way a parent needs to maintain control over a child. A person can be firm without being dominant, especially physically dominant.  I’ve seen and heard stories of dogs with fear-based aggression.  They’ll go on day after day, mild, even fearful, until one day theu can just snap.  OFten these are the case you hear about when people say they never saw it coming, that the dog was always so mild mannered.  Well, the dog was so much mild mannered but scared to death and that fear just got to a point that it was so overwhelming day in and day out that it took almost nothing to send it over that edge where  it felt the need to fight for it’s own survival.

I have always been very much against any kind of training methods the employed dominance and intimidation.  To me it smacks of abuse and if you just look at the news, you often see case of abused children  and spouses just “snapping” and turning around and taking out all the pent up anger and fear on their abuser or others.

SO next time you watch a show on dog training, take a close look at the methods and really think about what the trainer is doing.  Are they intimidating and scaring the dog into submission?  How long will any living creature put up with being scared to death?  Sure, they may only “turn” one on however many times, but what happens then?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Be Sociable, Share!
Email This Post Email This Post

Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!