My Mission

Deanna Raeke
Deanna Raeke
Dog Lover & Proud Pet Parent


Passionate when it comes to my canine companions as well as dogs everywhere, it's my mission to raise awareness of any issues that affect them, from their health, food and nutrition and training to their welfare. Canine advocacy is something that everyone who cares about dogs needs to be aware of and we all need to share that and raise our voice for those who cannot speak for themselves.

Andrea RosenbuckAndrea Rosebrock
Andrea has come onboard FTLTD to help out by contributing some stories and following-up with her "Justice Round-Up" series.

For the Love of the Dog is my small effort to do that. Please, won't you help me!

Join Me on Facebook!

Please be sure to stop by Facebook and join the FTLTD page there. All the news from FTLTD plus much more. You can scroll through and see the latest stories and info that's been posted just by looking below.

Categories

Copyright

All articles on this site, unless otherwise attributed, are copyrighted to and property of Deanna Raeke. You are welcome to use my articles (excerpts) but please be so kind as to link to my site as per terms under the Creative Commons License. Thank you!

Creative Commons License
For the Love of the Dog by Deanna Raeke is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at My Contact Page.

Dogs, Smarter Than We Thought

As dog owners and dog lovers we all probably think our pooches are pretty smart, right?  Well it looks like they may be even smarter than we thought! It seems dogs can do something that previously only humans, including infants have been shown capable of doing.

Friederike Range of the University of Vienna, who led a study to see if dogs could imitate selectively, depending on the situation.

Range and her colleagues trained Guinness, a female border collie, to push a wooden rod with her paw to get a treat. A dog generally does not use its paws to do tasks, preferring to use its mouth whenever possible. So the key question was whether dogs that watched Guinness would decide how to get the treat depending on the circumstances.

After making sure the owners could not influence their pets’ behavior, researchers tested three groups of dogs. The first 14, representing a variety of breeds, did not watch Guinness. When taught how to use the rod, about 85 percent pushed it with their mouth, confirming that is how dogs naturally like to do things.

The second group of 21 dogs watched Guinness repeatedly push the rod with her paw while holding a ball in her mouth. In that group, most of the dogs — about 80 percent — used their mouth, imitating the action but not the exact method Guinness had used. That suggested the dogs — like the children — decided Guinness was only using her paw because she had no choice.

The third group of 19 dogs watched Guinness repeatedly use a paw on the rod with her mouth free. Most of those dogs — 83 percent — imitated her behavior exactly, using their paws and not their mouth. That suggested they concluded there must be some good reason to act against their instincts and do it like Guinness. (The Washington Post)

Now this may not sound like a big deal but it says alot about the cognitive reasoning in dogs because this is pretty complex reasoning.  Now it seems that there is  quite a debate as to what this means and what it really shows.

Whether it’s as Brian Hare, who studies dogs at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology says, “What’s surprising and shocking about this is that we thought this sort of imitation was very sophisticated, something seen only in humans. Once again, it ends up dogs are smarter than scientists thought.  This suggests they can actually think about your intention — they can look for explanations of your behavior and make inferences about what you are thinking.”

And Stanley Coren at the University of British Columbia, who studies how dogs think comments, “It really shows a higher level of consciousness. This takes a real degree of consciousness.”

Or on the other side, Daniel J. Povinelli, a cognitive scientist at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette says, “It’s so easy for the human mind to look at a dog doing something like this and force our human way of thinking about it on the dog. This ability might happen automatically without any conscious reflection on the dog’s part.”

And as Bruce Blumberg, who teaches classes on dog behavior at Harvard University comments, “Dogs are really keen observers of the world around them. They use simple but reliable rules that capture just enough of a problem to be able to just do better than guessing. This may just be another example of that.”

From my point of view it shows me that one way or another, our beloved canine companions are alot smarter then we often give them credit for.

What do you think? Feel free to comment! :)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Fark
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • LinkedIn

Related Posts

  • No Related Post



I love hearing your comments but when posting please;
1. Use common courtesy
2. Watch profanity, PG-13 please!
3. Stay on topic - comments that have nothing to do with post will be deleted.
4. Please do not type in ALL CAPS! Caps=Yelling
5. Do not include email addresses, phone numbers or other personal information in comments. It will be removed!

Posts that are offensive or obscene will be removed.

Comments on this site do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the site owner. Within reason, I believe in giving everyone the right to express their opinion whether I agree with it or not but the bottom line is this is my site, I own it and I decide whether to allow a comment or not. Thanks!


1 comment to Dogs, Smarter Than We Thought

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>